阳光肺科

 找回密码
 立即注册

微信扫码登录

搜索
查看: 75|回复: 1

新闻模板(Lancet Oncology)

[复制链接]

103

主题

48

回帖

1万

积分

超级版主

积分
16102
JEBM 发表于 2024-1-2 00:07:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Burki T. Cancer survivors continue to smoke. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):e423. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70393-6. PMID: 25328950.

截图202401020005323525.png

报道以下文章:
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; published online Aug 6. http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/ lookup/doi/10.1158/1055-9965. EPI-14-0046





报道来自JAMA的文章。这样的新闻往往涉及政策,经济学等。
截图202401020039527267.png




报道来自美国CDC的最新电子烟和常规烟草流行病学信息。报道篇幅较大。起到对于分析和传播国家CDC信息的作用。
截图202401020042157753.png

报道 发表于BMJ的临床研究 Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients’ end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study | The BMJ
截图202401020109289049.png
回复

使用道具 举报

1356

主题

490

回帖

22万

积分

超级版主

积分
227837
杨学宁医师 发表于 2024-5-7 08:46:16 | 显示全部楼层
Alectinib superior to chemotherapy in advanced ALK+ NSCLC
The Lancet Oncology 19 (6), e285, 2018

Alectinib is more effective than standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on —or are intolerant to—crizotinib, according to a recent study. In the phase 3 ALUR trial, Silvia Novello (University of Turin, Turin, Italy) and colleagues enrolled 120 patients across 13 countries in Europe and Asia with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC, who had received previous treatment with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. 107 patients were randomised (2: 1) to receive alectinib (600 mg twice daily; n= 72) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² or docetaxel 75 mg/m², every 3 weeks; n= 35) until disease progression, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population; a key secondary endpoint was CNS objective responses in patients with measurable baseline CNS disease. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was significantly longer with alectinib than with chemotherapy (9· 6 months [95% CI 6· 9–12· 2] vs 1· 4 months [1· 3–1· 6], hazard ratio [HR] 0· 15; 95% CI 0· 08–0· 29, p< 0· 001). Independent review committee-assessed progression- free survival was consistent with these findings. In patients with measurable baseline CNS disease, a significantly larger proportion achieved an objective CNS response with alectinib (13 [54%] of 24) than with chemotherapy (0 of 16; p< 0· 001). Alectinib also had a favourable safety profile: grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 19 (27%) of 70 patients in the alectinib group versus 14 (41%) of 34 in the chemotherapy group.
“Although for first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive lung cancer alectinib was recently shown to be superior to the old standard crizotinib... a direct comparison with chemotherapy was missing so far,” explained coauthor Jürgen Wolf (University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany).“The ALUR trial now shows a significantly better progression-free survival, CNS efficacy, and tolerability compared to chemotherapy in chemotherapy and crizotinib-pretreated patients.”“We will always need chemotherapy,” commented David Ross Camidge (University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA),“but the more we understand about a cancer and can target its biology directly, the more we can put off the less personalised, scatter-gun approaches to treatment until later and as later lines of defence.”
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

给我们建议|手机版|PIME|阳光肺科 ( 粤ICP备2020077405号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-20 14:37

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表